Meningkatkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Mahasiswa Calon Guru IPA  melalui Implementasi Model Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI)

Ahmad Fauzi Hendratmoko

Authors

Ahmad Fauzi Hendratmoko Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Keywords:

Argumentasi Ilmiah, Argument-Driven Inquiry, Mahasiswa Calon Guru IPA

Abstract

Argumentasi ilmiah merupakan salah satu keterampilan yang harus dimiliki oleh mahasiswa calon guru IPA. Keterampilan tersebut dibutuhkan oleh mahasiswa untuk dapat berhasil dalam bidang akademik dan karir di era saat ini. Keterampilan tersebut juga merupakan salah satu praktik inti yang harus diterapkan dalam pembelajaran IPA. Meningkatkan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah pada diri mahasiswa calon guru IPA merupakan salah satu program penting untuk menghasilkan guru IPA yang berkualitas. Hal tersebut dapat dilakukan melalui implementasi model ADI. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peningkatan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa sebagai dampak implementasi model ADI. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan one-group pretest-posttest design dengan analisis normalized change. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi model ADI berdampak positif terhadap peningkatan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa. Peningkatan tersebut berada pada kategori sedang dengan rata-rata skor normalized change sebesar 0.39. Implementasi model ADI berdampak signifikan terhadap peningkatan indikator claim, evidence, dan reasoning. Namun, implementasi model ADI dalam penelitian ini belum berpengaruh signifikan terhadap peningkatan indikator counterclaim dan rebuttal.

References

N. I. Noviyanti, W. Rosyadah Mukti, I. Dahlia Yuliskurniawati, S. Mahanal, and S. Zubaidah, “Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skills Based on Differences in Academic Ability,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1241, no. 1, p. 012034, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012034.

N. G. Lobczowski, E. M. Allen, C. M. Firetto, J. A. Greene, and P. K. Murphy, “An Exploration of Social Regulation of Learning During Scientific Argumentation Discourse,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 63, p. 101925, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101925.

O. Noroozi, H. Dehghanzadeh, and E. Talaee, “A Systematic Review on The Impacts of Game-Based Learning on Argumentation Skills,” Entertain. Comput., vol. 35, p. 100369, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.entcom.2020.100369.

B. S. Haug and S. M. Mork, “Taking 21st Century Skills From Vision to Classroom: What Teachers Highlight as Supportive Professional Development in the Light Of New Demands from Educational Reforms,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 100, p. 103286, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103286.

H. O. Arslan, M. Genc, and B. Durak, “Exploring the effect of argument-driven inquiry on pre-service science teachers’ achievement, science process, and argumentation skills and their views on the ADI model,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 121, p. 103905, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2022.103905.

K. Guo, Y. Zhong, D. Li, and S. K. W. Chu, “Effects of chatbot-assisted in-class debates on students’ argumentation skills and task motivation,” Comput. Educ., vol. 203, p. 104862, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104862.

C.-Y. Fan and G.-D. Chen, “A scaffolding tool to assist learners in argumentative writing,” Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn., vol. 34, no. 1–2, pp. 159–183, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2019.1660685.

H.-Y. Ho et al., “Above-And Below-Average Students Think Differently: Their Scientific Argumentation Patterns,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 34, p. 100607, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100607.

J. A. Greene, B. M. Cartiff, and R. F. Duke, “A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relationship Between Epistemic Cognition and Academic Achievement,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 110, no. 8, pp. 1084–1111, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1037/edu0000263.

Q. Jin and M. Kim, “Supporting Elementary Students’ Scientific Argumentation with Argument-Focused Metacognitive Scaffolds (AMS),” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 1984–2006, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1947542.

A. Larrain, P. Freire, P. López, and V. Grau, “Counter-Arguing During Curriculum-Supported Peer Interaction Facilitates Middle-School Students’ Science Content Knowledge,” Cogn. Instr., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 453–482, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1080/07370008.2019.1627360.

I. L. L. Ping, L. Halim, and K. Osman, “Explicit Teaching of Scientific Argumentation as An Approach in Developing Argumentation Skills, Science Process Skills and Biology Understanding,” J. Balt. Sci. Educ., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 276–288, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.33225/jbse/20.19.276.

S. Rahayu, K. E. . Bambut, and F. Fajaroh, “Do Different Discussion Activities in Developing Scientific Argumentation Affect Students’ Motivation in Chemistry?,” J. Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 679–693, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.21831/cp.v39i3.32228.

L. Y. Hong and C. A. Talib, “Scientific Argumentation in Chemistry Education: Implications and Suggestions,” Asian Soc. Sci., vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 16–29, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.5539/ass.v14n11p16.

D. Kuhn, “Critical Thinking as Discourse,” Hum. Dev., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 146–164, 2019, doi: 10.1159/000500171.

V. Giri and M. U. Paily, “Effect of Scientific Argumentation on the Development of Critical Thinking,” Sci. Educ., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 673–690, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11191-020-00120-y.

J. Convertini, “An Interdisciplinary Approach to Investigate Preschool children’s Implicit Inferential Reasoning in Scientific Activities,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 171–186, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11165-020-09957-3.

C. Rapanta and K. Iordanou, “Argumentation and critical thinking,” in International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition), Elsevier, 2023, pp. 575–587.

W. Songsil, P. Pongsophon, B. Boonsoong, and A. Clarke, “Developing Scientific Argumentation Strategies Using Revised Argument-Driven Inquiry (rADI) in Science Classrooms in Thailand,” Asia-Pacific Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–22, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41029-019-0035-x.

L. Mao et al., “Validation of Automated Scoring for a Formative Assessment that Employs Scientific Argumentation,” Educ. Assess., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 121–138, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1080/10627197.2018.1427570.

S. Loper, K. L. McNeill, M. González-Howard, L. M. Marco-Bujosa, and L. M. O’Dwyer, “The Impact of Multimedia Educative Curriculum Materials (MECMs) on Teachers’ Beliefs about Scientific Argumentation,” Technol. Pedagog. Educ., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 173–190, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2019.1583121.

J. N. Mikeska and P. S. Lottero‐Perdue, “How Preservice and In‐Service Elementary Teachers Engage Student Avatars in Scientific Argumentation within a Simulated Classroom Environment,” Sci. Educ., vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 980–1009, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1002/sce.21726.

S. Admoko, M. N. R. Jauhariyah, E. Hariyono, and M. Madlazim, “Bibliometric Profile of Science Education Research on Argumentation and the Contribution of Indonesia,” in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Science and Engineering 2021 (IJCSE 2021), 2021, pp. 502–509, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.211215.085.

J. B. Henderson, K. L. McNeill, M. González-Howard, K. Close, and M. Evans, “Key Challenges and Future Directions for Educational Research on Scientific Argumentation,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 5–18, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1002/tea.21412.

J. F. Osborne et al., “Impacts of a Practice-Based Professional Development Program on Elementary Teachers’ Facilitation of and Student Engagement With Scientific Argumentation,” Am. Educ. Res. J., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1067–1112, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.3102/0002831218812059.

M. González‐Howard and K. L. McNeill, “Teachers’ framing of argumentation goals: Working together to develop individual versus communal understanding,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 821–844, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1002/tea.21530.

G. Zhao, R. Zhao, X. Li, Y. Duan, and T. Long, “Are preservice science teachers (PSTs) prepared for teaching argumentation? Evidence from a university teacher preparation program in China,” Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 170–189, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1080/02635143.2021.1872518.

J. N. Mikeska and H. Howell, “Simulations as Practice‐Based Spaces to Support Elementary Teachers in Learning How to Facilitate Argumentation‐Focused Science Discussions,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 1356–1399, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1002/tea.21659.

H. Ju and I. Choi, “The Role of Argumentation in Hypothetico-Deductive Reasoning During Problem-Based Learning in Medical Education: A Conceptual Framework,” Interdiscip. J. Probl. Learn., vol. 12, no. 1, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1638.

X. Zhai, Y. Yin, J. W. Pellegrino, K. C. Haudek, and L. Shi, “Applying Machine Learning in Science Assessment: A Systematic Review,” Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 111–151, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/03057267.2020.1735757.

A. H. Aldahmash and S. H. Omar, “Analysis of Activities Included in Saudi Arabian Chemistry Textbooks for the Inclusion of Argumentation-Driven Inquiry Skills,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 68, p. 100968, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100968.

A. W. R. Akili, A. Lukum, and L. A. R. Laliyo, “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Larutan Elektrolit Berbasis Model Argument-Driven Inquiry untuk Melatih Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMA,” J. Inov. Pendidik. Kim., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 22–29, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.15294/jipk.v16i1.28996.

C. Andrews-Larson, S. McCrackin, and V. Kasper, “The Next Time Around: Scaffolding and Shifts in Argumentation in Initial and Subsequent Implementations of Inquiry-Oriented Instructional Materials,” J. Math. Behav., vol. 56, p. 100719, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.100719.

C. A. Conn, K. J. Bohan, S. L. Pieper, and M. Musumeci, “Validity Inquiry Process: Practical Guidance for Examining Performance Assessments and Building a Validity Argument,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 65, p. 100843, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100843.

A. F. Hendratmoko, W. Wasis, and E. Susantini, “Development of Physics Learning Materials Based on Guided Inquiry Model Integrated with Virtual Laboratory to Facilitate Student’s Scientific Argumentation Ability,” Lensa J. Kependidikan Fis., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.33394/j-lkf.v4i1.29.

A. F. Hendratmoko, M. Madlazim, W. Widodo, and I. G. M. Sanjaya, “THE IMPACT OF INQUIRY-BASED ONLINE LEARNING WITH VIRTUAL LABORATORIES ON STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILLS,” Turkish Online J. Distance Educ., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1–20, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.17718/tojde.1129263.

M. Muntholib, A. Munadhiroh, N. C. E. Setiawan, and Y. Yahmin, “High School Students’ Scientific Argumentation on Chemical Equilibrium,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2021, p. 020046, doi: 10.1063/5.0043236.

Y. Nam and Y.-C. Chen, “Promoting Argumentative Practice in Socio-Scientific Issues through a Science Inquiry Activity,” EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 3431–3461, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00737a.

D. E. Pitorini, S. Suciati, and J. Ariyanto, “Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa: Perbandingan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dan Inkuiri Terbimbing Dipadu Dialog Socrates,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 26–38, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.21831/jipi.v6i1.27761.

S. Psycharis, “Inquiry Based-Computational Experiment, Acquisition of Threshold Concepts and Argumentation in Science and Mathematics Education,” Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 282–293, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.3.282.

R. Rohayati, S. Syihabuddin, D. Anshori, and A. Sastromiharjo, “The Role of Argument-Based Science Inquiry Learning Model to Improve Scientific Argumentation Ability,” J. Pendidik. Progresif, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1300–1310, 2022, doi: 10.23960/jpp.v12.i3.202223.

F. F. M. Roja, L. Yuliati, and A. Suyudi, “Kemampuan Argumentasi dan Penguasaan Konsep Dinamika Rotasi dengan Pembelajaran Inkuiri untuk Pendidikan STEM pada Siswa Kelas XI SMAN 2 Malang,” JRPF (Jurnal Ris. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 129–133, 2020, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um058v5i2p129-133.

H. L. Septyastuti, Sutrisno, and H. R. Widarti, “The Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Learning with OE3R Strategy for Scientific Argumentation Skill,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2021, p. 020004, doi: 10.1063/5.0043148.

C. Stanford, A. Moon, M. Towns, and R. Cole, “Analysis of Instructor Facilitation Strategies and Their Influences on Student Argumentation: A Case Study of a Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning Physical Chemistry Classroom,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 1501–1513, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00993.

J. P. Walker, V. Sampson, J. Grooms, B. Anderson, and C. O. Zimmerman, “Argument-Driven Inquiry in Undergraduate Chemistry Labs: The Impact on Students’ Conceptual Understanding, Argument Skills, and Attitudes Toward Science,” J. Coll. Sci. Teach., vol. 41, no. 4, 2011.

I. S. Kurniasari and W. Setyarsih, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) untuk Melatihkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa pada Materi Usaha dan Energi,” J. Inov. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 06, no. 03, pp. 171–174, 2017.

E. S. Nasution, “Peningkatan Keterampilan Berargumentasi Ilmiah Pada Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Argument- Driven Inquiry (ADI),” J. EKSAKTA Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 100, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.24036/jep/vol3-iss2/375.

V. Sampson, J. Grooms, and J. P. Walker, “Argument-Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study,” Sci. Educ., vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 217–257, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1002/sce.20421.

F. K. Annisanastiti and Suliyanah, “Penerapan Model Adi (Argument Driven Inquiry) Berbasis Argumentasi Toulmin Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik SMA,” J. Pendidik. dan Kebud., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 327–335, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.55606/jurdikbud.v3i2.1928.

S. M. A. Muhiddin and A. Agussalim, “PENERAPAN MODEL ARGUMENT-DRIVEN INQUIRY UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERARGUMENTASI ILMIAH MAHASISWA PADA TOPIK KALOR,” Karst J. Pendidik. Fis. DAN Ter., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 94–106, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.46918/karst.v6i2.2108.

M. Ventura, S. Moadebi, and D. Damian, “Impact of motivational interviewing training on emergency department nurses’ skills: A one-group pretest–posttest pilot study,” Int. Emerg. Nurs., vol. 56, p. 100980, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2021.100980.

J. D. Marx and K. Cummings, “Normalized Change,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 87–91, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1119/1.2372468.

S. P. Sriyansyah and D. Azhari, “Addressing an Undergraduate Research Issue about Normalized Change for Critical Thinking Test,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 131–137, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9602.

P. Dianti, A. Sunandar, and A. E. Setiadi, “Analisis Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa dengan Model Argument Driven Inquiry Berbasis Socio-Scientific Issue,” Qalam J. Ilmu Kependidikan, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.33506/jq.v12i2.2706.

Z. Hayati and S. Fuadiyah, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) terhadap Kemampuan Argumentasi Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran Biologi,” MASALIQ, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1111–1118, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.58578/masaliq.v3i6.1608.

W. Y. Inkomara and S. Suyono, “KELAYAKAN LEMBAR KEGIATAN PESERTA DIDIK UNTUK MELATIHKAN KETERAMPILAN ARGUMENTASI MELALUI MODEL ARGUMENT DRIVEN INQUIRY PADA LARUTAN PENYANGGA,” J. REDOKS J. Pendidik. Kim. DAN ILMU Kim., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 19–26, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.33627/re.v6i1.1133.

W. A. Putri and P. Paidi, “PENGARUH PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI BERBASIS ADI TOPIK KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA,” J. Edukasi Biol., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 22–34, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.21831/edubio.v9i1.19130.

N. Siregar and R. A. Pakpahan, “KEMAMPUAN ARGUMENTASI IPA SISWA MELALUI PEMBELAJARAN ARGUMENTASI DRIVEN INQUIRY (ADI),” LENSA (Lentera Sains) J. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 94–103, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.24929/lensa.v10i2.113.

N. D. C. Devi, E. Susanti VH, and N. Y. Indriyanti, “Analysis of High School Students’ Argumentation Ability in the topic of Buffer Solution,” JKPK (Jurnal Kim. dan Pendidik. Kim., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 152–159, 2018, doi: 10.20961/jkpk.v3i3.23308.

L. Faizah, R. M. Probosari, and P. Karyanto, “Penerapan Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Lisan Siswa Kelas XI pada Pembelajaran Biologi,” J. Biotek, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–12, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.24252/jb.v6i2.6395.

I. N. Firdaos, I. D. Pursitasari, and I. Permana, “Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry Pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa,” J. Penelit. Pendidik., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 88–97, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.17509/jpp.v21i2.37134.

Y. Rahayu, S. Suhendar, and J. Ratnasari, “Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Pada Materi Sistem Gerak SMA Negeri Kabupaten Sukabumi-Indonesia,” BIODIK, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 312–318, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.22437/bio.v6i3.9802.

A. Rahman, M. Diantoro, and L. Yuliati, “Students’ Scientific Argumentation Ability on Newton’s Laws in High School,” J. Educ. Theory, Res. Dev., vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 903–911, 2018.

T. Suganda, P. Parno, and S. Sunaryono, “Identifikasi Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa Topik Gelombang Bunyi dan Cahaya.,” J. Pendidik. Teor. Penelitian, dan Pengemb., vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 1413–1417, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/.

H. Suwono, E. Yulianingrum, and Sulisetijono, “Peningkatan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Melalui Model Pembelajaran ESAR (Engage, Study, Activate, Reflect),” J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2017, doi: 10.17977/jip.v23i1. 10751.

Y. Anwar, R. Susanti, and Ermayanti, “Analyzing Scientific Argumentation Skills of Biology Education Students in General Biology Courses,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1166, p. 012001, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1166/1/012001.

A. D. Wardani, L. Yuliati, and A. Taufiq, “Kualitas Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa pada Materi Hukum Newton,” J. Pendidik. Teor. Penelitian, dan Pengemb., vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 1364–1372, 2018, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i10.11734.

A. Anisa, A. Widodo, R. Riandi, and M. Muslim, “Genetics in Socio Scientific Issues: Measuring Rebuttal Abilities in Scientific Argumentation,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1280, no. 3, p. 032002, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1280/3/032002.

E. Capkinoglu, S. Yilmaz, and G. Leblebicioglu, “Quality of Argumentation by Seventh‐Graders in Local Socioscientific Issues,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 827–855, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1002/tea.21609.

M. Orbach et al., “A Dataset of General-Purpose Rebuttal,” 2019, doi: 10.18653/v1/d19-1561.

A. Hakim, I. Sahmadesti, and S. Hadisaputra, “Promoting Students’ Argumentation Skill Through Development Science Teaching Materials Based on Guided Inquiry Models,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1521, no. 4, p. 042117, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042117.

A. F. Hendratmoko, M. Madlazim, W. Widodo, S. Suyono, and Z. A. I. Supardi, “Inquiry and debate in science learning: Potential strategy for improving students’ scientific argumentation skills.,” Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 114–138, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3152.