Wayang Kulit as Diplomacy of Javanese Values at the Community Level: A Study of Local Performances in Blitar and Tulungagung
Keywords:
Leather Movie, Cultural Diplomacy, Javanese values, Digital Adaptation, EthnographicAbstract
This study aims to analyze the role of wayang kulit as a medium of cultural diplomacy at the community level with case studies in Blitar and Tulungagung Regencies, East Java. The purpose of the research is to identify the adaptation strategy of wayang kulit in maintaining its relevance in the modern era as well as uncovering the mechanism of transmission of Javanese values through this traditional performance. The research used a qualitative approach with ethnographic methods, including observation of 15 puppet performances, in-depth interviews with 12 key informants (puppeteers, audiences, and policy makers), and analysis of play script documents and performance recordings. The results of the study revealed three main findings: (1) Wayang kulit functions effectively as a space for value diplomacy through the creative adaptation of puppeteers in inserting contemporary messages; (2) There is a significant generation gap with only 18% of the audience being young (15-25 years old), but digital innovations such as short film content on social media platforms have emerged; (3) A shift in the creative economy model where 60% of the income of wayang groups now comes from institutional sponsorships. The novelty of this research lies in the development of the "Wayang Diplomacy 4.0" model that integrates the preservation of traditional values with digital adaptation and the strengthening of the creative economy, as well as findings on the role of performance liminality as a medium for local conflict resolution. The findings of this study make an important contribution to the development of community-based theory of cultural diplomacy and offer practical recommendations for policymakers in the preservation of traditional arts. This research expands the academic discourse on soft power culture by showing its application to non-state actors at the local level, while providing empirical evidence on the cultural resilience of the people of East Java in responding to the changing times.
References
Byman, R. (2005). Curiosity and the search for sensations: A conceptual and empirical study. Personality and Individual Differences, 38 (6), 1365-1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.004
American Anthropological Association. (2020). The principle of professional responsibility. https://www.americananthro.org/LearnAndTeach/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=22869
Arkorful, V., Barfi, R., & Abu, M. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cultural consumption: A global perspective. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(5), 768–784. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877921999661
Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checks: A tool to increase trust or just a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Chen, Y. (2022). A community-based approach to preserving intangible cultural heritage in the digital age. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 12(3), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-06-2021-0102
Creswell, J.W., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing between five approaches (4th edition). SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K. (2017). Research action: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (4th edition). Routledge.
Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I., & Shaw, L.L. (2011). Writing ethnographic field notes (2nd edition). University of Chicago Press.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice (4th edition). Routledge.
Lee, S., & Wang, X. (2023). Participatory cultural diplomacy in local communities. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 29(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2021.1982365
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: Method source book (4th edition). SAGE Publications.
Nugroho, A. (2021). The survival of Javanese puppets in the modern era: Challenges and strategies. Humanities, 33(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v33i2.1234
Park, J., Kim, S., & Lee, M. (2023). Rethinking cultural policies for traditional arts in the digital age. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 29(5), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2022.2055847
Pratiwi, D. (2023). Negotiation of tradition and modernity: The case of shadow puppets in urban spaces. Asian Journal of Theatre, 40(1), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1353/atj.2023.0004
Rahayu, E., Putri, A., & Santoso, A. (2023). Young people's perception of the appearance of puppets in the digital era. Journal of Performing Arts Studies, 15(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.21512/jpas.v15i1.8765
Richards, H.M., & Schwartz, LJ (2021). Qualitative research ethics: Are there any specific issues for healthcare research? Family Practice, 19(2), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/19.2.135
Santoso, B., & Wijaya, R. (2022). Cultural adaptation strategies in the preservation of wayang kulit in East Java. Journal of Arts and Culture, 14(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.24821/jsb.v14i2.7654
Spradley, J.P. (2016). Ethnographic interviews. Press Waveland.
UNESCO. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the cultural sector. UNESCO publications.
Wilson, M. (2022). Theory of cultural adaptation in practice: Lessons from traditional performing arts. Cultural Studies Review, 28(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v28i1.8125
Zhang, L. (2023). Media ecology and preservation of traditional art in a digital environment. Journal of Media and Communication, 17(4), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579231102458
