RAKYAT : Designing a 'Rencana Kebijakan yang Nyata' To Strengthen Public Involvement in the Legislative Process (integrative governance)

Penulis

  • Bagus reza fahlevi Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Anggi dwi pranata Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Muhammad zulfa fadil Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Kata Kunci:

e-democracy, legislative participation, sustainable policies, deliberative innovation, policy co-creation

Abstrak

This study develops an innovative model called RAKYAT (Rencana Kebijakan yang Nyata) to address the democratic deficit in Indonesia’s legislative process, particularly the lack of meaningful public participation. Although public involvement is a constitutional mandate, existing mechanisms remain largely symbolic and procedural, failing to bridge the gap between citizens and policymakers. Using a Research and Development (R&D) method, this study adopts a multi-stage design approach involving conceptual modeling, literature synthesis, stakeholder analysis, and prototyping. The proposed system integrates three normative pillars visibility, accessibility, and permeability adapted from parliamentary studies and deliberative democracy frameworks. Findings indicate that embedding participatory mechanisms within the legislative cycle can enhance transparency, improve feedback responsiveness, and institutionalize citizens' influence on policymaking. RAKYAT is designed as a digital co-legislation platform that includes legislative dashboards, e-consultation features, and deliberative public forums. Comparative insights from Norway and Finland support the feasibility and scalability of the system, while local political realities underscore the urgency of inclusive reform. This research contributes a hybrid policy-design framework that merges normative theory with system architecture to restore legislative legitimacy and democratic accountability.  The model has potential to transform public engagement from episodic protest to structured deliberation, thereby strengthening democratic resilience in developing political system.

Referensi

Alon-Barkat, S. (2020). Can government public communications elicit undue trust? Exploring the interaction between symbols and substantive information in communications. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz013

Berg, S., & Hofmann, J. (2021). Digital democracy. Internet Policy Review, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.4.1612

Berman, S. (2021). The causes of populism in the West. Annual Review of Political Science, 24, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102503

Cole, W. M., & Schofer, E. (2023). Destroying democracy for the people: The economic, social, and political consequences of populist rule, 1990 to 2017. Social Problems, 70(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spac060

da Silva, F. C., Manucci, L., & Veloso Larraz, D. (2022). Populism and nationalism revisited: A comparative study of the Spanish and Portuguese New Left. Nations and Nationalism, 28(3), 941–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12817

Damanik, E. R., Farina, T., & Nugraha, S. (2025). Krisis partisipasi publik dalam pembentukan undang-undang di Indonesia: Problematika hak konstitusional dan pengabaian aspirasi rakyat. INNOVATIVE: Journal of Social Science Research, 5(2), 2518–2540. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative

Dawson, S. (2023). Social Perspectives towards Biobased Products and Textiles. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032284

Fernández, V., Laborda, E., Del-Busto, F., & Bartolomé, C. (2023). Social Perspectives towards Biobased Products and Textiles. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032284

Fishkin, J. S. (2020). Deliberative democracy and public consultation: Designing better participation. Cambridge University Press.

Gandhi, J., Noble, B., & Svolik, M. (2020). Legislatures and Legislative Politics Without Democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 53(9), 1359–1379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020919930

García-Río, E., & Baena-Luna, P. (2024). Epistemology of e-democracy and e-governance through scientific mapping. Tourism and Management Studies, 20, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.18089/tms.2024SI01

Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., & Berge, J. (2025). Does Democracy Matter? Annual Review of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-060820

Hasan, H., & Linger, H. (2020). Letting the public in: dialectic tensions when local governments move beyond e-government to e-democracy. In Australasian Journal of Information Systems Hasan & Linger (Vol. 2020).

Hermanto, B., Nur, A. I., & Subawa, M. (2024). Indonesia parliamentary reform and legislation quality backsliding phenomenon: Case of Indonesia post reformasi. The Theory and Practice of Legislation. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2024.2316507

Indikator Politik Indonesia. (2024, April 21). Survei kepercayaan publik terhadap MK mulai pulih. Kompas.com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/04/21/16324381/survei-indikator-kepercayaan-publik-terhadap-mk-mulai-pulih

Indonesia Sentinel. (2025). Survey said: Indonesian National Military and President the most trusted public institutions. https://indonesiasentinel.com/survey-said-indonesian-national-military-and-president-the-most-trusted-public-institutions/

Johnson, J. A. (1997). Units of analysis for the description and explanation of personality. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 73-93). Academic Press.

Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia. (2023). Partisipasi Publik dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 20(1), 15–28. https://jlj.unja.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/169

Kneuer, M. (2016). E-democracy: A new challenge for measuring democracy. International Political Science Review, 37(5), 666–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512116657677

Liputan6. (2024, April 28). Indikator Politik Indonesia: Kejaksaan jadi lembaga paling dipercaya publik. https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/5577953/indikator-politik-indonesia-kejaksaan-jadi-lembaga-paling-dipercaya-publik

Magalhaes, G., & Roseira, C. (2020). Open government data and the private sector: An empirical view on business models and value creation. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.004

Matheus, R., & Janssen, M. (2020). A Systematic Literature Study to Unravel Transparency Enabled by Open Government Data: The Window Theory. Public Performance and Management Review, 43(3), 503–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1691025

Matsusaka, J. G., McCarty, N., Orlando, A., Peltzman, S., Spadijer, S., & Young You,

H. (2022). Is Direct Democracy Good or Bad for Corporations and Unions?

MAVRIKI, P. V., & Karyda, M. (2022). Big data analytics in e-government and e-democracy applications: privacy threats, implications and mitigation. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 14(1/2), 1.

https://doi.org/10.1504/ijeg.2022.10046669

Mu, R., & Wang, H. (2022). A systematic literature review of open innovation in the public sector: comparing barriers and governance strategies of digital and non-digital open innovation. Public Management Review, 24(4), 489–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1838787

Nikiforova, A., & Mcbride, K. (2020). Open Government Data Portal Usability: A User-Centred Usability Analysis of 41 Open Government Data Portals A Data Object-driven Approach to Data Quality Evaluation View project Open Government Intelligence (OGI)

View project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346322953

open Government Partnership. (2023). Indonesia: Strengthening public participation through digital legislation. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/members/indonesia/commitments/ID01 06

Orian Harel, T., Maoz, I., & Halperin, E. (2020). A conflict within a conflict: intragroup ideological polarization and intergroup intractable conflict. In Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 34, pp. 52–57). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.11.013

Pattyn, V., Blum, S., Fobé, E., Pekar-Milicevic, M., & Brans, M. (2022). Academic policy advice in consensus-seeking countries: the cases of Belgium and Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852319878780

Pelke, L., & Croissant, A. (2021). Conceptualizing and Measuring Autocratization Episodes. Swiss Political Science Review, 27(2), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12437

Pepinsky, T. B. (2025). Cleavages, Institutions, and Democracy in Indonesia: The 2024 Elections in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034251349467

Stratu-Strelet, D., Gil-Gómez, H., Oltra-Badenes, R., & Oltra-Gutierrez, J. V. (2023). Developing a theory of full democratic consolidation: Exploring the links between

democracy and digital transformation in developing eastern European countries.

Journal of Business Research, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113543

Thürk, M. (2022). Small in Size but Powerful in Parliament? The Legislative Performance of Minority Governments. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 47(1), 193–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12329

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.

van Zomeren, M., d’Amore, C., Pauls, I. L., Shuman, E., & Leal, A. (2023). The intergroup value protection model: A theoretically integrative and dynamic approach to intergroup conflict escalation in democratic societies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 28(2), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683231192120

WFD Indonesia. (2022). Democracy and Citizens’ Assembly in Southeast Asia. Westminster Foundation for Democracy. https://www.wfd.org/where-we-work/indonesia

Diterbitkan

2025-12-30

Cara Mengutip

fahlevi, B. reza, pranata, A. dwi, & fadil, M. zulfa. (2025). RAKYAT : Designing a ’Rencana Kebijakan yang Nyata’ To Strengthen Public Involvement in the Legislative Process (integrative governance). Proceedings International Conference on Aligning Sustainability With Vocational Innovations (ICASVI), 2(1), 19–39. Diambil dari https://proceeding.unesa.ac.id/index.php/icasvi/article/view/7657

Artikel Serupa

Anda juga bisa Mulai pencarian similarity tingkat lanjut untuk artikel ini.